When Winter Strikes: Lessons from the 2010 Dulles Hangar Collapse

When Winter Strikes: Lessons from  the 2010 Dulles Hangar Collapse

When Winter Strikes: Lessons from the 2010 Dulles Hangar Collapse

Winter is a season that every King Air owner and pilot operating in North America knows well. The question each morning is often: Did it snow enough to justify firing up the snowblower or was it just a light dusting that will melt away with a bit of sun? While snow is often a manageable inconvenience, sometimes winter’s impact can be catastrophic – especially when it comes to protecting your King Air.

A severe snowstorm at Washington Dulles International Airport (KIAD) in February 2010 demonstrated just how devastating winter weather can be. The snowfall was so intense that even industrial-grade snow removal equipment couldn’t keep pace. Snow accumulated rapidly, adding tremendous weight to the roofs of several hangars. Tragically, some of these roofs collapsed under the burden, crushing or severely damaging approximately $440 million worth of aircraft housed within. This event remains the largest aviation loss in the history of general aviation (non-airline), and it left a lasting impact on how aircraft insurance policies and hangar agreements are structured today.

Immediate aftermath: Claims and challenges

The claims process was complex, lengthy and fraught with challenges for aircraft owners affected by the Dulles hangar collapse. These unlucky owners fell into three categories: those who would have their aircraft totaled, those who faced lengthy repair periods and the few who wanted their aircraft totaled but faced a legal battle to do so.

The event highlighted several key issues that remain relevant for King Air operators today:

  • Total loss or repair

Many owners immediately wanted to know if their aircraft was totaled – and if so, when they would receive their insurance payout.

  • Diminution of value and extra expense

For those whose aircraft were repairable but significantly damaged, questions arose about compensation for the loss in market value (diminution of value) and coverage for supplemental lift while their aircraft was out of service.

  • Emotional and practical considerations

Some owners simply did not want to fly their repaired aircraft again and preferred a total loss settlement.

Access and assessment delays: The cost of waiting

The first step in any claim is assessing the damage. However, this was delayed at Dulles because the site was unsafe for days. For aircraft owners, this delay meant that the clock on extra expense coverage – insurance that helps pay for things like chartering another aircraft while your aircraft is being repaired – started ticking without the ability to begin repairs. Depending on your policy, extra expense coverage may start on the day of physical damage or the first day you charter a replacement aircraft.

If your King Air is declared a total loss, extra expense coverage typically ends or, at best, it continues only until the insurance company issues your settlement check. This creates a delicate balance: Insurance carriers want to avoid paying extra expenses unnecessarily and delays in damage assessment can inadvertently increase costs for both parties.

The importance of an accurate insured value

For King Air owners, one of the most critical lessons from the Dulles event is the importance of maintaining an accurate insured value. The insurance payout for a total loss is based on the amount stated on your policy’s declarations page, minus any deductible. If you are underinsured, your settlement check may not be enough to replace it with a like kind and quality aircraft. Conversely, being overinsured can make it harder for the insurer to declare a total loss, potentially prolonging repairs and depleting your extra expense coverage before the repairs are complete.

Regularly review your insured value, especially after major upgrades or modifications – such as avionics enhancements, engine overhauls or interior refurbishments – to ensure your policy reflects your King Air’s true worth.

Extra expense coverage: Know your policy details

Extra expense coverage is a vital component of your King Air insurance policy, but it varies widely between insurers. Some policies offer limited coverage with daily caps and short durations, while others provide more generous terms – sometimes up to 180 days of coverage without a per-day limit.

It’s essential that King Air operators who rely on their aircraft for business understand the nuances of their extra expense coverage. If your aircraft is grounded for repairs, will your policy cover the cost of chartering a replacement aircraft? How long will that coverage last? Are there waiting periods or caps that could leave you exposed?

Diminution of value: The hidden cost of repairs

One of the most challenging aspects of aircraft damage claims is the issue of diminution of value. When your King Air undergoes major repairs, the damage history is recorded in the logbooks. This history can reduce the aircraft’s market value, even if repairs restore it to a better-than-airworthy condition.

Unfortunately, most aircraft insurance policies exclude coverage for diminution of value. The only way to recover this loss is typically through a third-party liability claim, such as when another party was negligent and both sides agree on a settlement amount. This is why it’s crucial for King Air owners to carefully review any contracts they sign with fixed base operators (FBOs) or maintenance providers. Many contracts include clauses that waive your right to pursue diminution of value claims or subrogation rights, which can limit your ability to recover losses.

Always submit contracts to your insurance carrier for approval before signing, especially if they include indemnity or hold harmless provisions.

Hangar lease agreements: Watch for unfavorable language

The Dulles collapse also underscored the importance of reviewing hangar lease agreements. Many leases contain hold harmless clauses that shift liability to the aircraft owner, potentially leaving you financially responsible for damage caused by hangar failures or other incidents.

King Air owners should scrutinize their hangar contracts for language related to:

  • Hold harmless agreements

These may limit your ability to recover damages from the hangar owner or operator.

  • Diminution of value waivers

These clauses waive your right to claim loss in market value.

  • Maintenance and repair responsibilities

These provisions could impose unexpected costs on you.

Negotiating favorable terms or seeking legal advice before signing can save you significant headaches down the road.

Constructive total loss endorsement: A valuable tool for King Air owners

One of the most difficult situations for aircraft owners is when the insurer opts to repair an aircraft that the owner believes should be totaled. Repairs can be lengthy and complex, especially for King Airs with specialized equipment and OEM-approved modifications. Extended repair times can exhaust extra expense coverage, and the complexity of repairs can exacerbate diminution of value concerns. Fortunately, some insurers can provide a constructive total loss endorsement that can help avoid this scenario.

Traditionally, insurers decide to total an aircraft if the cost to repair plus the salvage value equals or exceeds the insured value. This formula can make it difficult to total an aircraft that is expensive to repair but still technically repairable. A constructive total loss endorsement modifies this threshold. For example, if the combined cost to repair and salvage value reaches 80% of the insured value, the insurer agrees to total the aircraft. This endorsement gives King Air owners more certainty and can reduce the financial and operational burdens of prolonged repairs.

Conclusion

Winter weather will always pose risks to aircraft owners and operators, and understanding your insurance coverage and contractual obligations can mitigate those risks. For King Air owners who rely on their aircraft for business, the financial and operational impacts of an event like the Dulles hangar collapse can be devastating but doesn’t have to be.

By proactively managing your insurance policy, reviewing contracts and considering endorsements like constructive total loss, you can protect your King Air investment and ensure you’re prepared for whatever winter throws your way.

Remember, the cheapest insurance option is rarely the best when you need to make a claim. Invest in coverage that matches the value and importance of your King Air to your business.

About the Author